MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991534004

Hamilton Canada : The city of opportunity : 500 diversified industries.

2014· article· en· W6991534004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Diversity (politics)Sustainability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

with giant pines and maples and bisected by quaint old paths and Indian trails, the "mountain" is a magnet that the nature-lover finds irresistible.On its summit thousands of citizens have made their homes, two in- cline railways and several picturesque driveways making the top easily accessible.There are many other beautiful drives and places of historic and picturesque interest in and about Hamilton, and what is of equal, if not greater importance, Hamilton is fortunate in having ample hotel accom- modation for conventions, tourists and other visitors, the Royal Connaught hotel, built by the citizens and operated by the United Hotels, being a model after which many of the finest hotels in the United States and Canada have been patterned.Hamilton is the City of opportunity for manufactur- ers, business men and working men.Hamilton i s naturally beautiful and naturally an industrial centre.Hamilton is a place where people "live" and do not merely work and exist.Hamiltonis the place for you.INDUSTRY and BEAUTY BEAUTY is not always the hand-maid of industry. Many industrial centers are not desirable residentialcities, but in Hamilton it is different.Electric power is so cheap that comparatively little coal is used and the industries that do emit smoke, dust, odors and other detriments to the average city's beauty are located on the Harbor front, so that the prevailing south-west winds blow the nuisance producers out over the water.The industrial sections are sufficiently removed from the residential areas not to rob them of their homey atmosphere, yet close enough to be conveniently reached by the working classes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.015
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicRegional Economics and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207