A História Militar como Tema: os contributos historiográficos de Cristóvão Ayres (1851-1930), da Revista de História (1912-28) e de Fidelino de Figueiredo (1888-1967)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Military History as topic: the contributions of Cristóvão Ayres (1851-1930), the Revista de História (1912-28) and Fidelino de Figueiredo (1888-1967). Between the end of the Nineteenth Century and the National Dictatorship (even during the Estado Novo), the Military History was a traditional one. However, we can observe a proto-scientific attempt from the last quarter of the Nineteenth Century on. Cristóvão Ayres and Fidelino de Figueiredo, both Sociedade Nacional de História’s founders, devote themselves to military topics. The first one wrote some works on this issue, the second one worked these questions only in an episodic way, opting for a testimonial writing entitled O Pensamento Político do Exército, published in 1926. The aim is to analyze this tract in a comparative way with works by Cristóvão Ayres and articles from the Revista de História.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".