MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991588036

Hydronic Heating and Cooling System For Price Industries’ Mock-Up Room 1

2020· report· en· W6991588036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2020
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverheating (electricity)Work (physics)Cooling towerWindageHeat flow
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Price Industries researches and manufactures air, heating, and cooling distribution products. To show their clients how their products will perform in real-world environments, Price Research Center North uses mock-up rooms that create heating and cooling requirements to test various terminal units, such as fan coils or radiant wall panels. These types of terminal units require a continuous source of hot or cold water, which passes through the unit to heat or cool the space. The current closed-loop hydronic system in Mock-Up Room 1 takes up to 6 hours to stabilize before testing can start and does not have enough capacity to test all their products. Price Industries reached out to the University of Manitoba with the hopes that a student-led team can design a new closed-loop hydronic heating and cooling system for their Mock-Up Room 1. The system must be able to stabilize in under an hour, vary the flow rate to the terminal unit from 0.2 to 12 GPM, and supply temperatures ranging from 8 to 85°C. The supply temperature and flow rate should not vary by more than 0.5%, and the whole design should fit within a supplied cabinet space of 26”x180” and 42” tall. The team came up with concepts to meet each of the client’s needs, then combined them into a base layout. The team then used analytical calculations and numerical modeling to verify the base design and provide information to size the boiler, pipe diameter, pipe material, and the piping insulation. The final design uses a 36 kW inline boiler to provide 85°C hot water, and a cold water loop that circulates between a flat plate heat exchanger, cooled by an existing 1°C glycol line, and a 22 Gallon storage tank set at 8°C. Depending on the set temperature, a three-way mixing valve will let through the hot and/or cold water as needed, which is then pumped at 12 GPM to another 3-way valve that controls the flow rate by diverting excess flow from the terminal unit to the return line. The final design was proven to be stable from the analytical calculations with a maximum stabilization time of 5 minutes. A 3D model is provided to demonstrate how the design fits in the cabinet space, and schematic drawings are provided for contractor installation. A complete bill of materials with vendors and costs are included, with the total cost coming to just over $19,000. If Price would like more customizable control over the flow rate, a VFD may be installed on the main circulator pump; however, this did not fit within the budget. Further, money could be saved by downsizing the boiler anywhere from 36 kW down to 5 kW, if Price is willing to sacrifice stabilization time of up to an hour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→French-language works237,207→