High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation with Gaussian Process Prior Variational Autoencoders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bayesian optimisation (BO) using a Gaussian process (GP)-based surrogate model is a powerful tool for solving black-box optimisation problems but does not scale well to high-dimensional data. Previous works have proposed to use variational autoencoders (VAEs) to project high-dimensional data onto a low-dimensional latent space and to implement BO in the inferred latent space. In this work, we propose a conditional generative model for efficient high-dimensional BO that uses a GP surrogate model together with GP prior VAEs. A GP prior VAE extends the standard VAE by conditioning the generative and inference model on auxiliary covariates, capturing complex correlations across samples with a GP. Our model incorporates the observed target quantity values as auxiliary covariates learning a structured latent space that is better suited for the GP-based BO surrogate model. It handles partially observed auxiliary covariates using a unifying probabilistic framework and can also incorporate additional auxiliary covariates that may be available in real-world applications. We demonstrate that our method improves upon existing latent space BO methods on simulated datasets as well as on commonly used benchmarks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".