MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991733655

The impact of loading and physical activity measures on outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis, and implant survivorship in patients following knee arthroplasty

2023· dissertation· en· W6991733655 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJewish General HospitalArthritis Society
KeywordsSurvivorship curvePhysical activityImplantArthroplastyOsteoarthritisActivity trackerQuality of life (healthcare)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 3: The relationship between knee loading during gait and cartilage thickness in non-traumatic and post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis……………. 41 3.1 Abstract………………………………………………………………………….42 3.2 Introduction…………………………………………………………………...... 43 3.3 Methods………………………………………………………………………… 45 3.4 Results………………………………………………………………………….. 50 3.5 Discussion……………………………………………………………………….59 3.6 Chapter 3 References………………………………………………………….... 64 Preface to Chapter 4……………………………………………………………………….. 67 iii Chapter 4: Vastus medialis intramuscular fat is associated with reduced quadriceps strength, but not osteoarthritis severity……………………………….. 4.1 Abstract………………………………………………………………………….4.2 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 70 4.3 Methods………………………………………………………………………… 72 4.4 Results………………………………………………………………………….. 77 4.5 Discussion……………………………………………………………………….4.6 Conclusions…………………………………………………………………….. 88 4.7 Chapter 4 References…………………………………………………………… Preface to Chapter 5……………………………………………………………………….. Chapter 5: Understanding the impact of physical activity level and sports participation on implant integrity and failure in patients following unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review…………….. 5.1 Abstract………………………………………………………………………….5.2 Background……………………………………………………………………... 5.3 Methods………………………………………………………………………… 99 5.4 Results………………………………………………………………………… 5.5 Discussion…………………………………………………………………….. 113 5.6 Conclusions…………………………………………………………………… 5.7 Chapter 5 References………………………………………………………….. Preface to Chapter 6……………………………………………………………………... Chapter 6: Comparing evoked pain responses and the prospective prognostic value of different measures of sensitivity to physical activity among people with knee osteoarthritis………………………………………………………………… 124 6.1 Abstract……………………………………………………………………….. 125 6.2 Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 6.3 Methods……………………………………………………………………….. 6.4 Results………………………………………………………………………… 6.5 Discussion…………………………………………………………………….. 146 6.6 Conclusions…………………………………………………………………… 6.7 Chapter 6 References………………………………………………………….. Chapter 7: General discussion………………………………………………………... 154 7.1 General discussion…………………………………………………………….. 7.2 Chapter 7 References………………………………………………………….. Chapter 8: Conclusion and summary………………………………………………..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes→French-language works237,207→