MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991803794

Inductive biases and generalisation for deep reinforcement learning

2021· dissertation· en· W6991803794 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReinforcement Learning in Robotics
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningFocus (optics)Scope (computer science)Transfer of learningArtificial neural networkDeep learningMoment (physics)Inductive bias
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>In this thesis we aim to improve generalisation in deep reinforcement learning. Generalisation is a fundamental challenge for any type of learning, determining how acquired knowledge can be transferred to new, previously unseen situations. We focus on reinforcement learning, a framework describing how artificial agents can learn to interact with their environment to achieve goals. In recent years, by using neural networks to represent agents, it has achieved remarkable success and vastly expanded its scope of possible applications. Our goal is to improve the performance of these agents by allowing them to learn faster, to learn better solutions and to react robustly to previously unseen situations. On this quest, we explore a range of different methods and approaches.</p>\n\n<p>We focus on incorporating additional structures, also called inductive biases, into the agent. Focussing on specific, yet widely applicable problem domains, we can develop specialised architectures which greatly improve performance. In Chapter 3 we focus on partially observable environments in which the agent is prevented full access to all task-relevant information at every moment in time. In Chapter 4 we turn our attention to multi-task and transfer learning and devise a novel training method allowing us to train hierarchically structured agents. Our method optimises for re-usability of individual solutions, greatly enhancing performance in transfer settings.</p>\n\n<p>In the second part of this thesis, we turn our attention towards regularisation, another form of inductive bias, as a means to improve generalisation of deep agents. In Chapter 5 we first explore stochastic regularisation in reinforcement learning (rl). While these techniques have proven highly effective in supervised learning, we highlight and overcome difficulties in applying them directly to online rl algorithms, one of the most powerful and widely used types of learning in rl. In Chapter 6 we investigate generalisation in deep rl on a more fundamental level by exploring how transient non-stationarity in the training data can interfere with the stochastic gradient training of neural networks and can bias them towards worse solutions. Many state of the art rl algorithms introduce these types of non-stationarity into the training, even in stationary environments, by using a continuously improving policy for data collection. We propose a novel framework to reduce the non-stationarity experienced by the trained policy, thereby allowing for improved generalisation.</p>\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicReinforcement Learning in RoboticsFrench-language works237,207