MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991814855

Identifying research-needs related to impacts of water quality on the integrity of distribution infrastructure

2006· article· en· W6991814855 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaAmerican Water Works Association Research Foundation
KeywordsWater qualityDistribution (mathematics)General partnershipQuality (philosophy)Water resourcesFoundation (evidence)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drinking water systems can experience frequent changes in their water-sources, treatment processes and/ or practices to maintain safe and aesthetically acceptable water quality. In addition, as new water quality regulations are implemented, further changes in water quality are anticipated. Evaluation of the impacts of such changes on the structural integrity of the distribution infrastructure is a daunting undertaking due to numerous inter-related processes occurring within the distribution system. A change in water quality may impact the structural integrity of the distribution infrastructure in many ways. The National Research Council Canada (NRC) and the American Water Works Association Research Foundation (AwwaRF) recently concluded a partnership project to identify key research needs related to the impacts of water quality changes on the integrity of the distribution infrastructure. This paper provides a synopsis of available knowledge and challenges in the protection of drinking water distribution infrastructure against water quality changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207