MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991833079

Interaction of electromagnetic waves with biological tissue

2001· other· en· W6991833079 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatteringDielectricPermittivityDebyeTransmission-line matrix methodBiological tissueMatrix (chemical analysis)Electromagnetic radiationElectromagnetic fieldField (mathematics)Time domain
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interaction of electromagnetic waves with biological tissue is investigated. Two problems in particular are studied. The first is three-dimensional scattering from biological tissue taking into consideration its dispersive nature. The other problem that is investigated is the thre -dimensional reconstruction of the dielectric properties of a body from the scattered field data resulting from interrogation with electromagnetic waves. The symmetric condensed node transmission line matrix method (SCN TLM) is used to study three-dimensional scattering from biological tissue. To simulate the dispersive nature of biological tissue, a second order Debye equation approximation of the permittivity in the frequency domain is used in a modified TLM technique. In this technique, the scattering matrix is independent of the dielectric properties of the medium, which are accounted for via lumped equivalent networks or sources connected to the nodes. These equivalent sources are calculated at each time step and includedin the scattering procedure of the TLM. To check the validity and accuracy of the modified TLM technique for dispersive homogeneous and nonhomogeneous dielectric bodies, some of the results of the numerical simulations are compared to those obtained analytically. Assuming a nondispersive nature of biological tissue, the nondispersive or stub-loaded SCN TLM method is used to obtain the near field data and hence the specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution. The results of both cases are compared. The modified TLM technique is then applied to a nonhomogeneous and geometrically complex dispersive dielectric body, which is the human head. To estimate the complex permittivities of three-dimensional inhomogeneous dielectric bodies, the unrelated illumination method is used. This method, which has been tested before with two-dimensional bodies, is extended to handle three-dimensional inhomogeneous dielectric bodies. The method utilizes the method of moments (MoM) to discretize the nonlinear integral equation, which relates the scattered field data and the complex permittivity. Yet, it differs from the other reconstruction techniques in that the way of acquiring information helps overcoming the ill-posedness nature of the problem. This is maintained by the proper arrangement of the polarization and the direction of the incident electric fields aiming to illuminate the body with a group of unrelated incident fields. Numerical simulations are carried out to assess the method and to test its robustness in the presence of measured data uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score1.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→French-language works237,207→