Record W6991893248

IP over CCSDS Space Links . Blue Book. Issue 1. September 2012. - CCSDS 702.1-B-1

2012· article· ca· W6991893248 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2012

Typearticle

Languageca

FieldComputer Science

TopicTechnology and Education Systems

Canadian institutionsnot available

FundersNuclear PhysicsNational Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCanadian Space AgencyCenter for Long-Term Cybersecurity, University of California BerkeleyGeo-Informatics and Space Technology Development AgencyIran Telecommunication Research CenterEuropean Space AgencyAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesKorea Aerospace Research InstituteNational Commission for Science and TechnologyTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Space OrganizationChina National Space AdministrationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeChinese Academy of SciencesU.S. Geological SurveyIndian Space Research OrganisationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNational Aeronautics and Space Administration

KeywordsProtocol (science)Space (punctuation)Data systemData linkData transmissionInternet protocol suite

DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Recommended Standard specifies a method for transferring IP Protocol Data Units (PDUs) via CCSDS Space Data Link Layer protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006

metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003

Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated

Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none

Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable

GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none

Teacher disagreement score0.819

Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

Category	Codex	Gemma
Metaresearch	0.006	0.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)	0.001	0.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)	0.001	0.001
Bibliometrics	0.011	0.017
Science and technology studies	0.002	0.002
Scholarly communication	0.005	0.017
Open science	0.004	0.002
Research integrity	0.002	0.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)	0.002	0.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085

GPT teacher head0.379

Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work

Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Scholarly communication Research integrity Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Study designNot applicable

Domainnot available

GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0

Published2012

Admission routes1

Has abstractyes

Download record (JSON)Report an issue with this record

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)→Same topicTechnology and Education Systems→French-language works237,207→