Integrated Modeling of Short-Term Flood Forecasting in the Ottawa River
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ: Les inondations sont considérées comme l'un des risques naturels les plus dangereux au monde. Plusieurs pays souffrent des conséquences néfastes des inondations. Au Canada, plusieurs provinces ont subi des inondations au cours du siècle dernier. Par exemple, la rivière des Outaouais a été confrontée à de nombreuses inondations comme en 2017 et 2019. La population d'Ottawa continue à augmenter d'une année à l'autre. C'est pour cela que nous avons choisi la rivière des Outaouais comme étude de cas pour ce projet dans le but de protéger la société contre les risques causés par les inondations. Les pays adoptent plusieurs solutions basées sur différentes méthodes afin de minimiser les dommages causés par les crues. La plupart des scientifiques s'accordent que la prévision des crues est la meilleure façon de limiter les conséquences des crues. Les systèmes de prévision des crues sont indispensables dans les pays fréquemment confrontés à des crues. Ils visent à fournir un long délai d'exécution et à fournir aux autorités et aux décideurs des informations suffisantes. Par conséquent, ils auront suffisamment de temps pour prendre les mesures adéquates pour sauver la vie de la population et limiter les catastrophes économiques dues aux inondations. ABSTRACT: Floods are one of the most catastrophic natural disasters in Canada and around the world that can cause loss of life and damages to properties and infrastructures. Saguenay flood (1996), southern Alberta flood (2013), and Ottawa floods (2017, 2019), are a few examples of Canadian floods with tremendous socio-economic impacts. Flood forecasting and predicting its characteristics (e.g., its magnitude and extent) has an important role in preventing and mitigating such flood impacts. Particularly, short-term forecasting is crucial for early warning systems and emergency response to floods. This study presents an integrated hydraulic-hydrologic modeling system for flood prediction. In this system, the Delft3D two-dimensional hydrodynamic model is connected with a HEC-HMS hydrologic model and observation data to provide an automatic exchange of data and results. Delft3D and HEC-HMS were chosen for this study because they were widely used and provided good results. In addition, they were applied in several flood forecasting studies. The prediction weather data and watershed characteristics provide input to the hydrological model to predict streamflow conditions, which are then automatically fed into the hydrodynamic model. The hydrodynamic model simulates the flood characteristics such as water level, 2D depth-averaged velocity field, and flood extent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".