The Inventorization of Intangible Cultural Heritage
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is reason to believe that the new UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, already ratified by more that 70 countries and requesting that signing countries draw up inventories, will have a major impact on inventorization and further contribute to the exploration of its potentialities. The advent of digital equipment, computerized data bases and their access via the web has revolutionized the inventorying of intangible cultural heritage. New information technologies have not only facilitated the fabrication, the management, and the accessibility to inventories, they are providing new venues to approach, conceive and practice inventory making itself. The word inventorization, already in use in Québec and Belgium, will be employed here to refer to these new inventive practices. Far from providing a simple archive of intangible cultural heritage, inventorization aims to be a dynamic process of communication and cultural revitalization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it