Introduction, Symposium: The Evolution of Justice Anthony M. Kennedyâs Jurisprudence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
of the United States Supreme Court needs little justification.Justice Kennedy's jurisprudence undeniably deserves special attention, with his increasing frequency as the deciding vote on the Supreme Court.As the thoughtful contributions that follow demonstrate, Justice Kennedy's growing number of opinions offer a rich body of material for scholarly exploration, easily justifying similar symposia at every American law school at the beginning of the twenty-first century.Thus, in celebration of Justice Kennedy's quarter century of service on the United States Supreme Court, this issue of the McGeorge Law Review, "The Evolution of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's Jurisprudence," has gathered a series of articles by noted scholars, some former Kennedy court clerks, and other teaching colleagues.They reveal Justice Kennedy's indelible influence on the current state of American law by exploring his opinions in the areas of life, liberty, and property, the First Amendment, criminal justice, and a commentary on the emerging significance of international law in his thinking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".