Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interactions of Image is an essay that connects practices of contemporary painting reliant on pre-existing images, with the more general experience of linking and conceptualizing myriads of daily encounters with Western visual culture.Is there a genuine experience of image?How do we make sense of reality through images rather than embodied experience?How do contemporary painters use pre-existing images to create new visions that point to this very particular encounter with the visible? Interactions of Image est un article o les pratiques de peinture contemporaine dpendant d'images prexistantes rejoignent l'exprience de tracer des liens et de conceptualiser la multiplicit de rencontres quotidiennes avec la culture visuelle occidentale.Peut-on parler d'une exprience vraie de l'image?Comment donner sens la ralit au travers des images plutt que par le biais d'une exprience incarne du monde?Comment les peintres contemporains utilisent-ils les images prexistantes afin de crer de nouvelles visions qui mettent en relief cette rencontre particulire avec le visible?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".