The Investigation of Activity Level, Leisure and Community Participation in Disabled Workers with Upper Extremity Problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyse the community participation level of disabled individuals with upper extremity deficit, who work in the industry. Material and Methods: The participants were asked about their demographical status and which sectors they work in. Disability Assessment Schedule–II (WHO-DAS-II) was used to evaluate the community participation level; Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was utilized to evaluate the activity performances; Recreational Time Satisfaction Schedule (RTSS) was used to evaluate their level of satisfaction for recreational time. Results: 67 disabled individuals, 18 (%26,9) of them being female; 49 (%73,1) of them being male, with an average age of 35,50±9,23 were included in the study. Analysing the diagnosis of the disabled individuals with upper extremity deficit who we included in the study; we saw that 13 (19,4%) of them had hemiparathic cerebral paralysis; 12 (17,9 %) of them had upper extremity amputation. The mean total score of WHO-DAS-II was 19,49±1,20; the mean score of COPM was 8,46±2,60 and the mean score of RTSS satisfaction was 3,59±0,49. A significant and statistically negative relationship between the all COPM results and total WHO-DAS-II score was found (p<0,05). It was found a significant negative relationship between total RTSS satisfaction score and total WHO-DAS-II score (p<0,05). conclusion: In this study, it was found that activity performance and recreational time satisfaction affect the community participation. Therefore, beside the physiotherapy and occupational therapy programs; it is necessary to enhance and increase artistic, cultural and sport activities for disabled individuals with upper extremity deficit in order to increase the community participation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".