A Jupiter permanent tethered observatory. Dynamical analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La exploración de los planetas exteriores se ve limitada por la escasez de potencia eléctrica. Fuentes habituales en vehículos de larga duración ?conversión de energía solar en eléctrica? no son efectivas a distancias grandes del Sol. Así, en Júpiter, la intensidad de la radiación solar es sólo del 4% de su valor en la Tierra. En misiones a Júpiter, disponer de potencia extra permite usar instrumentos que normalmente no se incluyen por su consumo excesivo. Por este motivo la misión JIMO de NASA contemplaba el uso de energía nuclear. Las amarras espaciales ?tethers? electrodinámicas constituyen una alternativa en la producción de energía a bordo de la nave. Este artículo describe la dinámica de un observatorio permanente situado en una de las lunas interiores de Júpiter (Adrastea, Tebe, Metis, Amaltea) alimentado por un tether electrodinámico trabajando en el régimen generador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".