MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992041215

The journal of raptor research.

2003· article· en· W6992041215 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAcademic Writing and Publishing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJenny ja Antti Wihurin RahastoNatural Environment Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State UniversityU.S. Forest ServiceJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTexas Parks and Wildlife DepartmentDirectorate for Biological SciencesU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceOulun YliopistoKansainvälisen Liikkuvuuden ja Yhteistyön KeskusU.S. Bureau of Land ManagementMinnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust FundIdaho Department of Fish and GameNew Mexico State UniversityRaptor Research FoundationNew Mexico Department of Game and FishLouisiana State UniversityNational Park ServiceCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeNational Science FoundationUniversity of MinnesotaScottish Natural HeritageBoise State UniversityMississippi State UniversityWeber State UniversityLouisiana Department of Wildlife and FisheriesOregon State UniversityUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraWorld Wildlife FundMassachusetts Department of Fish and GameAndrew W. Mellon FoundationU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsKey (lock)Exposition (narrative)Subject (documents)Focus (optics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American Kestrels (Falco sparverius) wintering in southcentral Florida were captured in order to collect their pellets.Dry mass of pellets was used as an index to the accumulated mass of prey consumed between dawn, when pellets representing prey consumed the previous day were regurgitated, and time of capture.Kestrels holding territories covered by a large proportion of suitable hunting substrate (grasses and weedy forbs <25 cm in height) consumed greater prey mass during morning than did kestrels inhabiting territories of lesser foraging quality.No difference was found between territories of high and Stinson, C. H., D. L. Crawford and J. Lauthner 1981.Sex differences in winter habitat of American Kestrels in Georgia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBiodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution)Same topicAcademic Writing and PublishingFrench-language works237,207