La poesía inglesa de la naturaleza en el XVIII y su influencia en Meléndez Valdés
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
‘Nature’ is a key word at the beginning of the 18<sup>th</sup> c. that appear in all fields of knowledge; the term is frequently repeated by literary critics, and thus Pope would advice poets: «First follow Nature, and your Judgment frame/By her just Standards, which is still the same», <i>Essay on Criticism</i>. Under the influence of Descartes, Newton and Locke, the beauty mean harmony, balance and perfect measure. During the fist quarter of 18<sup>th</sup> c. the representation of nature wild end up in the Thomson’s poem <i>Winter</i>. Would read the scottish poet in the english original (in his library there is a sample of the 1744 edition), and the poem wild exert considerable influence on the poet from Extremadura, above all in the <i>Odas filosóficas y sagradas</i>.<br><br>Nature’ es una palabra clave a comienzos del siglo XVIII que aparece en todos los campos del conocimiento; el término es repetido una y otra vez por los críticos literarios, y así Pope aconsejará a los poetas: «First follow Nature, and your Judgment frame/By her just Standards, which is still the same», <i>Essay on Criticism</i>. Bajo la influencia de Descartes, de Newton y de Locke, la belleza viene a significar armonía, equilibrio y orden perfecto. Durante el primer cuarto del XVIII la representación de la naturaleza desembocará en la obra de Thomson, <i>Winter</i>. Meléndez leerá al poeta escocés en el original inglés (en su biblioteca consta un ejemplar de Seasons, edición de 1744), y el poema ejercerá bastante influencia sobre algunas composiciones del extremeño, sobre todo en las <i>Odas filosóficas y sagradas</i>.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it