MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992268140

La canonización de Ignacio de Loyola (1622): lucha de intereses entre Roma, Madrid y París

2016· article· en· W6992268140 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Women Writers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasModerna
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Independence (probability theory)Latin AmericansWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La canonización de Ignacio de Loyola simbolizó el triunfo de un nuevo modelo de espiritualidad; el mismo que reflejaban Felipe Neri, Teresa de Jesús y Francisco Javier, canonizados todos
\nen bloque —junto a Isidro Labrador— en 1622. Tal acción “canonizadora” no tuvo precedentes.
\nPero además de un modelo espiritual, en concreto la canonización del fundador de la Compañía
\nde Jesús, significó la glorificación de un nuevo proyecto político que se analizará en las siguientes
\npáginas: el apoyo de Roma a una Monarquía francesa, recién convertida al catolicismo, mostrándola
\ncomo única protectora de la Compañía de Jesús, de la que Ignacio era su fundador. De esta forma,
\nla imagen de santidad proyectada desde el Papado fue la de un San Ignacio alejado de todo vínculo
\nde origen con la Monarquía hispana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it