La comunicación entre enfermeras quirúrgicas: conviviendo entre dos mundos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La comunicación es una herramienta fundamental para el desarrollo profesional de las enfermeras, con consecuencias negativas o positivas en función de los diferentes estilos comunicativos y dinámicas de grupo. Este estudio tiene como objetivo conocer cómo es la comunicación intraprofesional entre enfermeras dentro del área quirúrgica, identificando modelos conductuales, factores generadores de satisfacción/insatisfacción, entre otros. MetodologÃa: Estudio cualitativo etnográfico. Resultados: El mayor determinante de satisfacción y compromiso asociado a la comunicación intraprofesional son las relaciones sociales que se establecen, por encima de la autonomÃa, de las cargas de trabajo, de la presión del tiempo fundamentalmente. Conclusiones: Es importante darse cuenta de lo necesario que es transmitir de una forma adecuada los conocimientos, estableciendo un feed-back, sin barreras, siendo empáticos y asà reconocer nuestras necesidades para aumentar eficacia y eficiencia en nuestro ámbito.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".