La pratique du DIY comme art de la résistance, une marge à la croisée de l’institué et de l’instituant : l’exemple de la “scène“ punk »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colloque international en deux volets : La création comme résistance : où la création résiste-t-elle ? [Lectures, analyses et récits du printemps étudiant québécois et de quelques autres mouvements sociaux contemporains sous l’angle de la production artistique], Montréal, 27 et 28 mars 2014 et Paris, 26, 27 et 28 mars 2015. Après une première édition montréalaise en mars 2014, le second volet de ce colloque international interrogera les lieux dans lesquels la création résiste dans le sens le plus fort du terme : non seulement en temps de crise mais aussi, malgré tout et obstinément, loin de l’effervescence médiatique de l’événement. Les lieux envisagés seront aussi bien hyper-contemporains qu’inscrits dans une mémoire des lieux disparus, résorbés, imaginaires et virtuels. https://www.fabula.org/actualites/documents/67309.pdf (consulté le 17/12/2019).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.045 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".