La traduction de la pensée culturelle russe par Desiderio Navarro à Cuba, 1960-2009
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé : Desiderio Navarro (1948 -), traducteur, penseur, théoricien, éditeur et activiste culturel demeure peu connu au Canada et en Amérique du Nord en général ainsi qu’en Europe où son œuvre a pourtant été reconnue en 2009 par l’octroi du prix Prince Claus des Pays-Bas. Il a considérablement influencé la pensée culturelle cubaine et latino-américaine des quarante dernières années, en particulier grâce à la revue Criterios, fondée par lui en 1972, et qui, depuis, n’a cessé d’offrir au public hispanophone les principaux écrits des théoriciens russes de la littérature, de l’esthétique, de l’art et de la culture (Bakhtine et Lotman, entre autres).\nL'activité de traduction de théories n’a cependant pas été un objectif en soi pour Desiderio Navarro. Cette thèse montre en effet que la trajectoire de cet intellectuel engagé représente, d’un côté, une lutte permanente contre des doxas autant nationales qu'internationales, et, de l’autre, un effort constant pour diffuser les nouvelles théories et les idées, stimuler la création théorique et artistique, et ce afin d’encourager le rôle de l'intellectuel critique dans une société soumise de manière permanente à un stress idéologique. Dans le cas de Navarro, traduction, théorie et activisme social se combinent dans une équation à caractère récursif. Ce travail analyse un corpus de traductions de la pensée culturelle russe, traduit et publié par Navarro en 2009, sous la forme d'une anthologie. Cette analyse permet de souligner le poids et l’impact de deux conditions déterminantes dans son travail de traducteur: son identité transculturelle et son positionnement antinéocolonial................................\nAbstract : Desiderio Navarro (1948 -), translator, thinker, theoretician and cultural activist remains almost unknown in Canada, North America, and even in Europe, despite the fact that his work was recognized in 2009 with the Prince Claus Award from the Netherlands. He has considerably influenced the Cuban and Latin-American cultural thinking for the last forty years, particularly thanks to the journal Criterios, that he founded in 1972. Since then, this publication has continuously offered to the Hispanic public critical essays on aesthetics, theories of literature, arts and culture produced by Russian theoreticians (Bakhtine and Lotman, among others).\nNavarro's translation of theories, however, was not a goal in itself. This thesis shows that the path of this committed intellectual represents, on one side, a permanent fight against national and international doxas, and, on the other side, a constant dissemination effort of new theories and ideas, of stimulation of the theoretical and artistic creation, to promote the role of the critical intellectual in a society under permanent ideological stress. Navarro succeeded to combine translation, theory, and social activism in a recursive equation. This work analyzes a corpora of Russian texts on culture and literature, translated into Spanish by Navarro and published in 2009, in an anthology. The analysis underlines the weight and impact of two key determinants in his translation work: his transcultural identity and his antineocolonial positioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".