Liderazgo transaccional y su relación con el desempeño laboral de los colaboradores del banco de crédito del peru de la agencia españa - trujillo trimestre julio - setiembre 2017
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of the present investigation is to determine if there is a relationship \nbetween the transactional leadership and the work performance of Banco de Crédito del \nPerú employees of the agency Spain - Trujillo quarter July - September 2017 and at the \nsame time find the level of each one of the variables, as well as the level of relationship \nbetween both variables and also the analysis of relationships between the dimensions of \neach variable. \nThe problem formulated for the investigation was whether there was a relationship \nbetween the variables mentioned above, for which an alternative hypothesis was used in \nwhich the relationship was approved. \nLikewise, the population was made up of 15 collaborators, showing the total number of \nemployees as a relatively small population. \nThe methodology used for data collection was the survey as a technique and the \nquestionnaire as an instrument and the tools used were statistical methods, programs such \nas SPSS and Excel. \nThe most relevant results were that the employees considered that there is a high level of \ntransactional leadership with 80%, on the other hand, the level of work performance in \nthe collaborators was also high with 73.3% corroborating with the correlation of Pearson \nwhose value ratio coefficient was 0.820 where it is affirmed that there is a positive \ncorrelation of high level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it