Le service public culturel: missions publiques, enjeux administratifs et défis politiques The public cutural service: public missions, administrative stakes and political challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la perspective de la publication de ses prochains numéros, le comité scientifique du Centre d'études et de recherches en administration publique (CERAP) informe les auteurs intéressés par des questions administratives, des éventuelles opportunités de publication au sein de la revue Pyramides. Ce numéro spécial réalisé avec l’université d’Ottawa, s’intéresse à l’évolution du service public culture et aux dynamiques de changement qui ont cours. Ce numéro a trois objectifs, à savoir (1) un bilan des institutions, pratiques et mesures étatiques et administratives dans une perspective comparative. Ensuite, (2) un examen des nouveaux défis administratifs, sociaux et politiques qui se dessinent pour les praticiens des administrations culturelles du secteur public (3) la question des choix de gestion (financement, intéressement, mobilisation des acteurs, communication, marketing ….) et des enjeux que ces choix soulèvent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".