MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992505770

Le renouveau de la présence étatique colombienne en zone rurale suite aux Accords de Paix de 2016 entre le Gouvernement national et les Forces Armées Révolutionnaires de Colombie - FARC

2020· other· fr· W6992505770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) · 2020
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaFirst world warSugar industry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ambition de ce travail de recherche est de comprendre si, depuis signature des Accords de Paix de 2016, l’Etat colombien réussi, à travers son Programme de Développement avec Approche Territoriale (PDET), à améliorer sa présence dans les zones les plus touchées par le conflit armé. L’accord aspire à consolider la démocratie et rompre le cycle de la violence en apportant les réponses concrètes aux problèmes spécifiques des zones rurales. Notre recherche explore les raisons historiques, institutionnelles et économiques de la problématique rurale en Colombie avec pour but de comprendre les effets des projet PDET, programme emblématique d’une réforme agraire d’envergure, premier pilier des accords de paix. Enfin en prenant le cas concret de la municipalité de Tumaco, nous mettrons en lumière les projets développés en nous questionnant sur la place reprise par l’Etat. Les nouvelles opportunités, du processus de paix, offre à l’Etat la possibilité de récupérer les prérogatives délaissées aux groupes armées pendant la durée du conflit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)French-language works237,207