MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992580923

Lighting for quality: NRC Canada Workshop

2001· article· en· W6992580923 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResearch councilGovernment (linguistics)PleasureQuality (philosophy)Research program
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Saturday August 5th, 2001 the Institute for Research in Construction of the National Research Council Canada (NRC) had the great pleasure of hosting a QVE committee research workshop for the second time. NRC had successfully hosted a QVE workshop once before, in 1995, on lighting quality and facial appearance see (http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc39865.pdf). Ottawa was the obvious choice for a workshop in 2001: NRC has a strong lighting research group and dedicated laboratory facilities, and folks were already travelling to Ottawa that week for the IESNA annual conference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicColor Science and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207