MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992590489

LPN to BN nurses: Introducing a new group of potential health care leaders

2011· article· en· W6992590489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAUSpace (Athabasca University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBachelorTransformational leadershipHealth careNursing careNurse AdministratorNurse education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vocationally educated Licensed Practical Nurses are seldom viewed as potential leaders in
\nhealth care organizations. And yet, transformational leadership practices were evident as
\nLicensed Practical Nurses graduated from a Bachelor of Nursing program and transitioned
\ntowards a new role. This article, framed from Kouzes and Posner’s (2007) model of
\ntransformational leadership, presents two key themes illustrating how these nurses changed and
\ngrew as a result of their university education. First, Post LPN to BN nurses identified a changed
\nawareness of the implications of their new role as they neared program completion. Second,
\nfollowing graduation, they developed confidence and a vision of the nursing profession as a
\nresult of upgrading their nursing credentials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it