MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992690416

The Making of An Echo Chamber: A Critical Discourse Analysis on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Educational Policies Across Public Schools in Greater Toronto Area, Ontario

2024· other· en· W6992690416 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYorkSpace (York University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork University
KeywordsCritical discourse analysisMulticulturalismInclusion (mineral)LegislationDiscourse analysisDiversity (politics)Performative utteranceSituatedMaking-ofCorporate governance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the legislation of Ontario Ministry of Education's PPM 119: Developing and Implementing Equity and Inclusive Education Policies in Ontario schools (2009), Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) practices and policies has been widely promoted across public education institutions in Ontario over the past decade. These policies and practices can be situated in Canada’s neoliberal and colonial context, where institutional antiracism work has been diluted as a celebration of diversity and multiculturalism, which has historically been a symbolic marker of Canada's nationhood and citizenship. These efforts led to the adoption of outcome-focused, individualized, performative policies. In wake of a recent tragic incident of a TDSB principal's suicide, its legal dispute linking the death to an antiracism training session in the workplace, as well as the consequent responses from media outlets and the public, this study presents a critical discourse analysis of the dominant institutional EDI culture and how it has led, or rather, impeded the development of antiracism across Ontario's public-school sector. Entering from a scan of the media responses reporting on the incident and its harshest critics about EDI programs, this study follows Fairclough's (1995) critical discourse analysis methodology in the efforts to trace back the lineage of today's institutional EDI programs from Canada's longstanding liberal multiculturalism agenda. Through analyzing documents of texts, images and videos detailing EDI policies and action plans, collected from the 4 largest public-school boards in the Greater Toronto Area, this study found an overwhelming echoing sentiment and neoliberal discourses with the state’s liberal multiculturalism and antiracism rhetoric. Last, this study attempts to reimagine the trajectory of antiracism work with a focus from a decolonial lens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0420.050
Scholarly communication0.0190.008
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYorkSpace (York University)French-language works237,207