Meaningful Music in Dementia Care: Anchoring Within Transient Situations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is currently estimated that there are 54 million people living with dementia in the world, and that there will be 130 million people living with the condition by 2050 (Alzheimer’s Society, 2020). In the United Kingdom alone there are around 850,000 people living with a formal diagnosis of dementia, and it is estimated that around a quarter of patients in UK hospitals have some form of dementia. (Alzheimer’s Society, 2009). There is a clear need to support the emotional care of patients living with dementia alongside their medical care in order to reduce the negative impact that hospital ward environments can have on their wellbeing. The use of meaningful music in dementia care is one such way of supporting socio-emotional needs alongside medical care. This thesis demonstrates how. The primary research question was to understand how patients in hospital who are also living with dementia engage with music and with what consequences, with regards to how music can support the relational aspects of care. Adopting elements of ethnography and grounded theory methodologies, the research focused specifically on the ways that live music was seen to support the wellbeing of patients living with dementia, through focusing on two specific objectives: 1. To examine how the environment and particularly the soundscape of a hospital ward affects the ward culture and hospital experience for patients living with dementia, and for care staff. 2. To explore how patients living with dementia respond to live music performances, and the ‘spin off’ effects of this for care staff. The research was conducted at one major acute-care hospital in England within two Elderly Care Units over a period of four months from November 2016 to March 2017. The data was formed from 104 hours of observations over 37 days, of 201 people, consisting of patients (with and without dementia), staff and visitors, including 54 music sessions performed by six musicians. In addition to this, one focus group was conducted with five members of staff, as well as one-off interviews with four musicians. The findings of the thesis reveal that familiar music can create positive associations for individuals living with dementia and their surrounding environment, creating increased feelings of emotional wellbeing. Additionally, shared experiences through music and its associations with reminiscence, were found to support social connections between the individual living with dementia and their care practitioners, which resulted in enhanced mutual understanding, that can be seen to continue after the music has ended. Through these shared experiences and increased connections, music is therefore able to create an environment which is more conducive to positive emotion. The thesis concludes that familiar, meaningful music delivered by musicians who can adapt their performance and connect with their ‘audience’ on an emotional level can support the wellbeing of people living with dementia within hospital wards, and possibly support staff to provide person-centred and relationship-centred care. The study presents a wide lens picture of music’s role within two dementia friendly hospital wards. I consider this to be ‘wide lens’ in that it looks beyond just the musical performance itself, to demonstrate music’s role in creating positive environments conducive to wellbeing, to create and sustain social connections, and to reduce feelings of frustration, isolation and agitation; outcomes that last long after the music has ended. The results are useful in the fields of music sociology, medical sociology, music therapy, community music, as well as practical applications in nursing and healthcare. Whilst the research was conducted in acute healthcare it is also anticipated that it presents wider implications for residential and domiciliary care of people living with dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".