Minutes of the sixth meeting on Monday 27 November 2000
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After few brief introductory remarks, the Chairman called on M. Lindroos, to report on the technical status of the ISOLDE facility on behalf of the PS ISOLDE team.This report was mainly devoted to the ISOLDE consolidation project which consists of two parts.The first (connected with improving radiation safety in buildings 179, 838 and 170) will bring buildings 179 and 838 to compliance with European legislation Class A requirements, and building 170 to those of Class C. In addition, the target manipulation robot is being renovated.The second part aims at ensuring that the number and quality of ISOLDE shifts delivered to experiments each year is adequate, and includes, among others things, new front-ends , better target manufacturing facilities, high resolution mode operation of the HRS and improvements of secondary beam tranport facilities.M. Lindroos remarked that while the carrying out of the consolidation programme work will not adversely affect the planned physics programme the lack of a spare front-end for the 2001 run could have an effect on the GPS programme as the GPS front-end is coming towards the end of its projected life-span.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.614 | 0.452 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".