Moments of meeting: 'Intersubjective encounters' and ‘emancipatory’ experiences of individuals with (intellectual) disabilities in inclusive musical contexts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore an intersubjective framework to better understand the relational aspects of two inclusive musical programs in London, ON. I focused on mutual recognition moments, called moments of meeting (MoM), researching how they are formed and manifested while music is shared, created, or experienced within these two environments. Approaching such programs as potentially intersubjective spaces, this study investigated the impact of MoM and intersubjective experiences on the participation of individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) in music making as well as on their perceptions of themselves as subjects. Equally significant, this study looked at emerging pedagogical practices such a framework affords.\nBy exploring an intersubjective conceptual framework, mainly drawing from the phenomenology of intersubjectivity (Husserl, [1931] 1960; Habermas, 1984, 1987; Merleau-Ponty, 1962), and relational psychoanalysis(Benjamin, 1988, 1995, 2018; Stern, 1999; Storolow & Atwood,1984, 2014), I proposed a relational view to the musical space and to the subject, aiming to understand how relationships and encounters built within inclusive spaces may help us to think of and construe meaningful inclusion and musical experiences with individuals with ID. Furthermore, envisioning polyphonic subjects who can express themselves from diverse subjective positions in the intersubjective space, I hope to provide relevant insights in the sense of addressing the ‘symptomatology’ of individuals with ID, viewing it as a potential subjective position that represents the subject being and interacting in and with the world, rather than mere dysfunction or impediment.\nThis research combined critical ethnography and interpretative phenomenology as qualitative approaches to explore of MoM from the perspective of research participants’ lived experiences and to understand how MoM are formed in the intersubjective musical space in each research scenario (Maggs-Rapport (2000). Over several weeks, I was immersed as a participant-observer in two inclusive musical programs based in London, Ontario – L’Arche Virtual Open Mic (VOM) and Dreams Come True Music Studio (DCT). Besides observations, field notes and research journals, I also conducted focus group meetings with volunteers, family members or caregivers and individual interviews with the program leaders and individuals with ID. In addition, a Collaborative Art-based Video Project (CAV) was designed and adopted here as a research method offering more and diverse opportunities for participation and sharing.\nAmong the findings, this study offers a map of the flow of moments describing the formation of experiences of "being seen and known" and MoM observed in the research sites, engages with participants' subjectivities and presents the impacts of intersubjective encounters in their perceptions of selves, and proposes pedagogical insights modelling a view of the inclusion from the perspective of the subject embracing new ways to exist and make music. Critical here is accounting for and better understanding of the potential impact such processes can have on the constitution of the subject and their subjectivity within musical experiences. I also hope to contribute to existing research creating alternatives to foster inclusive education that could inform in/pre-service music teachers’ education and pedagogical practices and cultivate comprehensive and holistic views of inclusion, music, and disability among the music education community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".