MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992803254

Miksi minun on pakko istua - vapauksia ja rakenteita luokkahuoneessa

2013· other· sv· W6992803254 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAaltodoc (Aalto University) · 2013
Typeother
Languagesv
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElement (criminal law)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Varför är de gamla strukturerna så seglivade i skolorna trots att reformpedagoger som Dewey, Montessori och Freinet redan för snart hundra år sedan betonade hur inlärning beror på elevernas egen aktivitet och känsla av mening i arbetet? Vilka element innehåller en framtida utopisk skola? Uppsatsen undersöker frågorna via intervjuer med professor Pirkko Pohjakallio, historielärare Petter Wallenius, studier av den antiauktoritära skolan Sudbury Valley School, den s.k. popupdagen i Arabian Peruskoulu samt skribentens egna erfarenheter som elev och lärare och medlem av en ledarlös orkester.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2260.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAaltodoc (Aalto University)French-language works237,207