MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992865990

Modelling and control of the piezoelectric excitation of an automotive windshield for active noise cancellation

2013· dissertation· en· W6992865990 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsNoise (video)WindshieldActive noise controlNoise controlAutomotive industrySystem identificationControl theory (sociology)Subspace topologyNoise floorNoise measurement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, a technique for implementing active noise control within an automotive vehicle is presented utilizing the actuation of a piezoelectrically driven windshield to create the anti-noise signal.The acoustic linearity of the power efficient speaker is also improved to match that of a traditional, high-performance cone speaker.With direct measurement of the corrupting noise signal impractical, a closed-loop feedback control system is designed to achieve both objectives simultaneously.Modelling of the plant dynamics is carried out by deterministic subspace identification on filtered empirical data of a laboratory apparatus which is scaled to match vehicular installations.A noise estimator, based on internal models of the system dynamics, generates a stream of synthetic noise measurements on which stochastic subspace identification is performed to produce periodically updated models of the plant disturbance.The spectral density estimate of the output disturbance is incorporated directly into H synthesis to identify an optimal feedback controller.Ambient highway noise and the window buffeting phenomenon, experienced by the driver-side passenger within the vehicle, are formulated and solved by independent optimization problems to maximize improvement of the passenger's acoustic experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207