MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992893474

Monthly performance and supplementary reports 2008 / Health Service Executive

2008· report· en· W6992893474 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) · 2008
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPartenariat Canadien Contre Le Cancer
KeywordsReimbursementFinancial managementManaged careProcess (computing)Primary careService (business)Closing (real estate)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Performance Summary -January 08The financial overrun in PCCC at the end of January is due to increased costs beyond budget provision in respect of the Primary Care Reimbursement Scheme and Demand Led Schemes.The situation is being closely monitored and a rigorous cost containment and business management programme is in place.The NHO also has an active cost containment process in place to address financial pressures and to ensure that activity levels will be managed in line with resource availability for the remainder of 2008. Key items to note for the month include:Implementation of A Fair Deal: From January 1 2008, the current nursing home subvention scheme was due to be replaced by a new nursing home care support scheme, A Fair Deal.The legislation to implement this has not yet been enacted.During 2008 PCCC will be implementing its introduction and any transition arrangements agreed with the DOHC, pending the legislation being introduced.• Private Nursing Home Beds: In January 2008 the Minister determined that an additional 200 long stay beds in private nursing homes be provided to support early discharge from acute hospitals in Dublin, HSE South and HSE West.The funding to be provided from the €110m in Letter

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2370.166

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library)French-language works237,207