MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992902476

Modelo para armar: Itinerarios y ámbitos disidentes del Partido Comunista en la formación de uno de los grupos fundadores de las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias (1960-1967)

2012· article· es· W6992902476 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, violence, and history
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYield (engineering)Work (physics)Value (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El artículo analiza la gestación de uno de los grupos fundadores de las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias: aquél liderado por Carlos Olmedo e integrado por militantes disidentes del Partido Comunista. Se analizan sus itinerarios y los ámbitos disidentes del partido por los que transitaron, identificando los núcleos político-ideológicos que los llevaron a apartarse del PC, constituir nuevos nucleamientos y formar finalmente el grupo que entre 1966 y 1967 intentó sumarse al proyecto de Ernesto Guevara en Bolivia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it