MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992925885

Monuments et mémoires publiés par l'Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres : Preservation Lab Treatment Report

2015· other· en· W6992925885 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOhio Digital Resource Commons (University of Cincinnati) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPancasila Values in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbrasion (mechanical)BreakageQuarter (Canadian coin)Head (geology)Delamination (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monuments et mémoires publiés par l’Académie des inscriptions et belles‐lettres is a quarter leather binding printed in 1899. The book measures approximately 35.8 cm high, 28.9 cm wide, and 4.1 cm deep. The hollow back quarter binding has dark brown leather at the spine over five false raised bands, and marbled paper covering the boards. \n\nOverall, the book is in fair condition. The leather at the spine is deteriorated, with significant abrasion and delamination throughout, and flaking leather at the head and tail. The marbled paper is abraded throughout, with delamination and loss at the board edges. The boards are slightly delaminated at the corners. The binding remains intact, but the lower board is detached from the textblock. The sewing remains intact throughout the textblock. The lower flyleaf is fully detached. The upper board remains attached, but there are breakage points of the inner hinge and the upper flyleaf hinge is compromised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it