Monuments et mémoires publiés par l'Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres : Preservation Lab Treatment Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monuments et mémoires publiés par l’Académie des inscriptions et belles‐lettres is a quarter leather binding printed in 1899. The book measures approximately 35.8 cm high, 28.9 cm wide, and 4.1 cm deep. The hollow back quarter binding has dark brown leather at the spine over five false raised bands, and marbled paper covering the boards. \n\nOverall, the book is in fair condition. The leather at the spine is deteriorated, with significant abrasion and delamination throughout, and flaking leather at the head and tail. The marbled paper is abraded throughout, with delamination and loss at the board edges. The boards are slightly delaminated at the corners. The binding remains intact, but the lower board is detached from the textblock. The sewing remains intact throughout the textblock. The lower flyleaf is fully detached. The upper board remains attached, but there are breakage points of the inner hinge and the upper flyleaf hinge is compromised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.387 | 0.103 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".