MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992951116

Mood detection and memory performance evaluation with body sensors

2016· dissertation· en· W6992951116 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoodAndroid (operating system)Memory testBluetoothPopulationCognition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis provides the design of a system employing an Android application connected to body sensors, which is capable of assessing the mood and memory performance of humans. The mood detection is based on the heart rate, its variability, as well as on the captured brain waves. The memory performance is evaluated based on specific brain waves observed as well. The application requires the connection of sensors to an Android device to obtain data. Sensors for the heart and brain were used along with the Android device to obtain data. The Sensors are connected to the Android device via Bluetooth Low Energy. Data was gathered and processed from these sensors using clever algorithms. Data was filtered using the right filters, a Hanning window was applied to it, and finally the fast Fourier transform was computed to provide data for a range of frequencies. The application was tested to assess how effective it was at finding the mood and memory performance levels of humans. To do so, we selected an adult population consisting of male and female individuals. The tests consisted of visual and auditory stimuli which drived the users to a particular mood such as sad, relaxed, angry, engaged, aroused, happy, and stressed. Furthermore, a short memory test was given to assess the memory performance level of each user. The mood experiment has been successful at raising the mood levels of the majority of participants when being shown stimuli composed of images and sounds. Negative or neutral mood levels could be explained by participants having other thoughts or emotions during the experiment, and by the attenuation and dampening of the body sensors' signals. The ability of participants to reach a particular mood (relaxed, engaged, sad) more quickly in response to a conducive stimulus is related to a person's physical characteristics; for example, younger participants reach a particular mood more quickly than older participants. The memory experiment has been successful at raising the memory levels of the majority of participants when being asked to perform a modified Sternberg memory task. Results show a positive memory activity for the majority of participants, even in the presence of signal attenuation in the body sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207