Near-Term Quantum Algorithms for Classical Sampling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the current era of noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, quantum sampling algorithms have been of great interest as they permit errors in their execution while maintaining their advantage over classical counterparts [26]. However, the sampling problems considered often do not possess immediate practical relevance. This thesis explores two quantum algorithms for applicable classical sampling problems that can be implemented on today’s quantum devices. Specifically, we are considering algorithms to sample from a Boltzmann distribution of a classical Hamiltonian. This sampling task is of significant importance in the fields of statistical physics, machine learning, and optimization. \n \nThe first such algorithm adiabatically prepares a quantum state which encodes the desired Boltzmann distribution [44]. Projectively measuring this state then produces uncorrelated samples from the desired distribution. The state preparation time scaling of this algorithm can be related to the properties of quantum phase transitions, giving physical insights into the mechanism of speedups found. Numerical investigations of the algorithmic performance on the Ising chain are reproduced, showing a quadratic improvement over a classical Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. On the same model, counterdiabatic driving protocols are explored with the limitation of local driving terms. It is shown numerically this restriction of local driving terms leads to unfavourable scaling of the state preparation time. \n \nNext, the quantum-enhanced Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm is explored [23]. This hybrid algorithm creates a Markov chain over the classical configuration space, where new configurations are proposed through a projectively measured quantum evolution. This algorithm has guaranteed convergence, independent of the quality of the evolution, making it an algorithm suited for near-term implementation. The performance of this algorithm on the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model is numerically reproduced, showing faster mixing time than classical MCMC in the low-temperature limit. Bottlenecks of this chain are then explored for the Ising chain, giving an analytic bound on performance showing the algorithmic advantage found for small systems numerically persists for larger system sizes. Finally, this algorithm is tested numerically on the maximum independent set problem, which is native to an array of Rydberg atoms and has been experimentally realized on current quantum devices [12]. Our findings did not indicate any advantage of the quantumenhanced MCMC algorithm over classical algorithms for the limited number of numerically accessible system sizes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".