MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6993072968

Nonlinear dynamics of shells and plates subjected to pulsatile flow

2017· dissertation· en· W6993072968 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQatar Foundation
KeywordsNonlinear systemFlow (mathematics)Dynamics (music)Pulsatile flowDeformation (meteorology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flow-induced vibrations due to unsteady flow often occur in many engineering areas.A specific type of unsteady flow is represented by oscillatory and pulsatile flows, which are prevalent in industrial and biological systems; applications include pump and valve operations in pipeline systems as well as blood circulation.Associated to pulsatility, wave propagation in elastic tubes is recognised as the fundamental principle of the pressure pulse in arteries.This propagation phenomenon is due to the fluid-structure interaction and not to fluid compressibility.The pulse wave velocity is related to the underlying vessel wall stiffness.In biomechanics and vascular surgery, thin-walled shell theory can be applied to model the mechanics of veins, arteries, pulmonary passages, and artificial blood vessels.This thesis focuses on the development of a new theoretical framework able to reproduce the nonlinear dynamic response of shells and plates to axial pulsatile flow.The flow is set in motion by a pulsatile pressure gradient.Coupled fluid-structure Lagrange equations of motion for a non-material volume subject to pulsatile flow and pressure with and without wave propagation are obtained and presented for the first time in the literature.The studied systems are represented by a plate periodically supported and a circular cylindrical shell with flexible boundary conditions.The fluid model is based on the potential flow theory.Numerical bifurcation analysis and time integration methods are employed to investigate the stability of the systems described using a refined reduced order model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207