MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6993103425

Neocortical Long-Term Depression and Depotentiation in the Adult Freely Moving Rat

2002· dissertation· en· W6993103425 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2002
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTachyphylaxisLong-term potentiationField (mathematics)Noise (video)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information is believed to be stored in the brain by constructing new neural circuits, and these circuits are shaped by changes in the strength of the synaptic connections between the neurons making up the circuit. According to most theories of memory, new circuits can be formed by either increasing or decreasing the strength of synaptic connections. Bidirectional modifications in synaptic efficacy are also central components in recent computer simulations of learning and memory. While long-term potentiation (LTP) has been the focus of extensive research into the mechanisms underlying information storage in the mammalian brain, long-term depression (LTD) and depotentiation, its depressive counterparts, have not. Furthermore, most of the LTD research has involved the use of anaesthetized animals and in vitro slice preparations, making it more difficult to determine the role of this synaptic phenomenon in learning and memory in the intact behaving animal. This thesis provides the first detailed examination of: 1) the induction and decay of both LTD and depotentiation in the neocortex of the awake, freely moving animal; 2) the effects of N-methyl D-Aspartate receptor (NMDAR) blockade on the induction of LTD, LTP, and depotentiation (NMDA receptor activation is known to play a major role in most forms of LTP); and 3) the interactions between these synaptic phenomena. LTD was expressed as a significant reduction in the amplitude of both short and long-latency field potential components. Depotentiation was expressed as a long lasting decrease in the amplitude of a previously enhanced late component. LTD was found to be greater in magnitude and longer lasting when the conditioning stimulation was repeated. However, unlike LTP induction, the conditioning stimulation was equally effective whether spaced over hours or days. NMDA receptor antagonism blocked LTP induction and instead produced a depression effect similar to LTD. Unlike LTP, LTD and depotentiation were found to be NMDAR-independent in the neocortex of the freely moving rat. LTP and LTD are both reversible phenomena and LTD-inducing stimulation can modulate the effects of LTP-inducing stimulation. LTD-inducing stimulation, when delivered following to LTP-inducing stimulation, attenuates the induction rate for potentiation. LTD and depotentiation may play important roles in the ongoing experience-induced modification of neuronal connectivity. Furthermore, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that potentiation and depression reflect the physiological instantiation of a bidirectional learning rule.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→