A New Elliptic Mean. Sitzungsberichte und Anzeiger der math.-nat. Klasse / Jahrgang 2002
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seit 1848 stellen die Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse ein wichtiges Medium der naturwissenschaftlichen Wissensvermittlung dar. Seit einigen Jahren sind die Inhalte der letzterschienenen Bände auch über das Internet abrufbar. Inhalt:Abteilung I: Biologische Wissenschaften und Erdwissenschaften209. Band, Jahrgang 2002 - SitzungsberichteTunner, H., Eine autochthone Population der Europäischen Sumpfschildkröte Emys orbicularis L) an der Leitha (Österreich, Burgenland); Abteilung II: Mathematisch, Physikalische und Technische Wissenschaften 211. Band, Jahrgang 2002 - SitzungsberichteCigler, J., Einige q-Analoga der Lucas- und Fibonacci-Polynome; Grünes, S., Gleichungenin linearen rekurrenten Folgen , Teil 1; Grünes, S., Gleichungenin linearen rekurrenten Folgen, Teil 2; Grünes, S., Gleichungenin linearen rekurrenten Folgen, Teil 3; Kahlig, P. and Matkowski, J., A Modified Golab-Schinzel Equation on a Restricted Domain (with Applications to Meteorology and Fluid Mechanics); Kahlig, P., A New Elliptic Mean; Cigler, J., Some Relations Between Generalized Fibonacci and Catalan Numbers; Paschke, F., Analysis of Photon Shapes and Prediction of a New Quantization Rule; Hittmair, O., Ernest Rutherford und das Wiener Radiuminstitut: Ein Kommentar zu einem Briefwechsel, wesentlich Marie Curie betreffend, mit dem Institutsdirektor Stefan Meyer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".