Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Coptic diaspora in Canada has long been grappling with issues of identity in our newly adopted spaces. Many feel retrofitted spaces are not ‘Coptic enough,’ that it’s not the way it was back home. Attempting to achieve this sense typically manifests in shipping art and trinkets from Egypt to display in our new spaces, or merely copying typologies into new build churches. However, this prompts further questions regarding the authenticity of the work and identity of the diasporic people, and lacks consideration of the contexts they currently live in. \n \nWhat has proven to be truly enduring and viscerally alive are the traditions which cross borders with us. These traditions, whether religious or secular, mitigate better cultural preservation than any stagnant artifacts, as they shift with the realities of those practicing them. \n \nThis project reimagines the revival of a since forgotten Epiphany parade, once widely celebrated throughout towns in Egypt, now lost in time, to be rekindled by the Canadian diasporic community here in Vancouver, British Columbia. In this space, culture becomes dynamic and entangled with all those participating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".