Bibliographic record
Abstract
ARTIKLAR Peter Schalk: Vad döljer ’Angkors leende’? Kurt Bergling: Historiepsykologi och Psyko-historia. Religionspsykologiska teori- och metodproblem LITTERATUR H. D. Hoffmann: Reform und Reformen. Untersuchungen zu einem Grundthema der deuteronomistischen Geschichtsschreibung. Anm. av Tryggve N. D. Mettinger David M. Gunn: The fate of king Saul. An interpretation of a biblical story. Anm. av Eva Strömberg Krantz Burke O. Long (red.): Images of man and God. Old Testament short stories in literary focus. Anm. av Eva Strömberg Krantz Samuel Terrien: The elusive presence. Toward a new biblical theology. Anm. av Sten Hidal R. C. Musaph-Andriesse: From Torah to Kabbalah. A Basic Introduction to the Writings of Judaism. Anm. av Tryggve Kronholm C. Perrot: Jésus et l'histoire. Anm. av René Kieffer Jarl Hemberg, Ragnar Holte & Anders Jeffner: Människan och Gud. En kristen teologi. Bengt Hägglund: Trons mönster. En handledning i dogmatik. Peter C. Hodgson & Robert H. King (red.): Christian Theology. An Introduction to Its Traditions and Its Tasks. Anm. av Per Erik Persson Lennart Koskinen: Tid och evighet hos Sören Kierkegaard. En studie i Kierkegaards livsåskådning. Anm. av Benkt-Erik Benktson Dieter Hoffmann: Der Weg zur Reife. Eine religionspsychologische Untersuchung der religiösen Entwicklung Gerhard Tersteegens. Anm. av Benkt-Erik Benktson Bo Frense: Religion och rätt. En studie till belysning av relationen religion–rätt i förkristen nordisk kultur. Anm. av Jan Arvid Hellström Nils Holmdaihl: Adolf Andersson, Dan Anderssons far. Anm. av Jan Arvid Hellström Jahrbuch für Liturgik und Hymnologie. 25 Bd. 1981. Anm. av Allan Arvastson AKTUELLT Tord Harlin: Rapport från Lutherska Världsförbundets studieverksamhet DISKUSSIONSINLÄGG Hans Åkerberg: Ang. svar på Kurt Berglings artikel
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.518 | 0.373 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".