Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Latin American Story Finder: A Guide to 470 Tales from Mexico, Central America, and South America, Listing Subjects and Sources. By Sharon Barcan Elswit. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2015. 318 pp. (Reviewed by John Bierhorst) The Princess and the Goblin and Other Fairy Tales. By George MacDonald. Edited by Shelley King and John B. Pierce. Toronto: Broadview, 2014. 382 pp. (Reviewed by Sara Cleto, The Ohio State University) Tales of the Brothers Grimm. Illustrated by Natalie Frank. Edited by Karen Marta. Bologna: Damiani Press, 2015. 272 pp. (Reviewed by Kirsten Rae Simonsen, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa) Folktales and Fairy Tales: Traditions and Texts from Around the World, 2nd ed. Edited by Anne E. Duggan and Donald Haase, with Helen J. Callow. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood, 2016. Four volumes: 388 pp., 364 pp., 376 pp., 462 pp. (Reviewed by Carmen Nolte-Odhiambo, University of Hawai‘i, West O‘ahu) The Edinburgh Critical Edition of the Selected Writings of Andrew Lang. Edited by Andrew Teverson, Alexandra Warwick, and Leigh Wilson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015. Two volumes: 452 pp., 415 pp. (Reviewed by Mary Sellers, Pennsylvania State University) Fairy Tales in Popular Culture. Edited by Martin Hallett and Barbara Karasek. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press, 2014. 217 pp. (Reviewed by Brittany Warman, The Ohio State University) New Approaches to Teaching Folk and Fairy Tales. Edited by Christa C. Jones and Claudia Schwabe. Logan: Utah State University Press, 2016. 252 pp. (Reviewed by Theodora Goss, Boston University) From Dog Bridegroom to Wolf Girl: Contemporary Japanese Fairy-Tale Adap- tations in Conversation with the West. By Mayako Murai. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2015. 178 pp. (Reviewed by Rose Williamson, University of Chichester) The Irish Fairy Tale: A Narrative Tradition from the Middle Ages to Yeats and Stephens. By Vito Carrassi. Translated by Kevin Wren. Lanham, MD: John Cabot University Press, 2012. 207 pp. (Reviewed by Deanna Allred, Utah State University) Japanese Mythology in Film: A Semiotic Approach to Reading Japanese Film and Anime. By Yoshiko Okuyama. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2015. 244 pp. (Reviewed by Micheline M. Soong, Hawai‘i Pacific University) The Politics of Magic: DEFA Fairy-Tale Films. By Qinna Shen. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2015. 311 pp. (Reviewed by Julie Koehler, Wayne State University) Preserving the Magic Spell: Basile’s “The Tale of Tales” and Its Afterlife in the Fairy-Tale Tradition. By Armando Maggi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. 401 pp. (Reviewed by Bethany Hanks, Utah State University) Seven Miles of Steel Thistles: Reflections on Fairy Tales. By Katherine Langrish. Oxfordshire, U.K.: Greystones Press, 2016. 294 pp. (Reviewed by Abigail Heiniger, Bluefield College) Transforming Tales: Rewriting Metamorphosis in Medieval French Literature. By Miranda Griffin. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2015. 270 pp. (Reviewed by Jack Zipes, University of Minnesota)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.471 | 0.439 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".