Bibliographic record
Abstract
7.1 Proteomic Advances for Epigenetics Research Benjamin Garcia University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Epigenetic mechanisms such as histone post-translational modifications (PTMs), small non-coding RNAs and DNA methylation play crucial roles in the establishment and induction of gene expression patterns that regulate several aspects of cellular biology. Here we will present methodology advances to gain eve more accurate descriptions of these epigenetic networks. Quantification of histone PTMs is performed by shotgun proteomics favoring discovery of novel/low level PTMs, or targeted analyses (SRM) of known PTM sites. Each workflow has strengths and weaknesses for PTM quantification. Data independent acquisition (DIA) for comprehensive data generation combined with targeted data processing has recently been demonstrated to provide very high quality quantitative data. The advantages of this approach for targeted PTM quantification include no upfront assay development, quantitative data on all analytes and no dynamic exclusion of isobaric peptides. In this study, we develop a SWATH™ acquisition platform for quantitating histone PTMs and isoforms under distinct biological conditions. In a second project, we have recently developed novel quantitative affinity mass spectrometry (MS) based proteomics approaches to characterize in vivo protein lysine methyltransferase (KMT) activity in human cancers. Currently, there are approximately 50 proteins encoded in the human genome that contain the catalytic SET (Suppressor of variegation, Enhancer of zeste, Trithorax) domain, characteristic of nearly all KMTs. Roughly about a fourth of these KMTs have been shown to methylate histone proteins substrates to regulate gene expression. However, despite widespread efforts, only a small number of non-histone protein substrates for any KMT are defined. The significance of KMT activity in both normal physiology and disease is emerging as highly significant, as association of over 25 KMTs with a multitude of different human cancers have been reported. Therefore, an unambiguous determination of KMT activity, target sites and induced cellular responses or phenotypes would be highly beneficial to the chromatin, cancer and clinical biology communities, as this information is severely limited. Discussed will be the methods that we have developed to identify over hundreds non-histone methylated proteins in human cells, the most comprehensive large scale global analysis of protein lysine methylation (e.g. the “methylome”) to date, including KMT specific methylomes. 7.2 Dissecting the Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Cancer Progression: A Proteomics-based Approach Alexandra Naba(1), Karl Clauser(2), Steven A. Carr(2), Richard Hynes(3) (1)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; (2)Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; (3)Howard Hughes Medical Institute, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex meshwork of cross-linked proteins that provides biophysical and biochemical cues that are major regulators of cell behaviors. ECM deposition (desmoplasia) is a hallmark of tumor progression and pathologists have used excessive ECM as a marker of tumors with poor prognosis long before the composition and the complexity of the ECM was even uncovered. However, the biochemical properties of ECM proteins (large size, insolubility) have compromised systematic characterization of ECM composition. We previously reported the development of a proteomic strategy to characterize the composition of in vivo ECMs and have shown that we can reproducibly identify 150+ ECM proteins in any given tissue or tumor type [1]. Using human tumor xenografts in mice, we demonstrated that both tumor cells and stromal cells contribute to the production of the tumor matrix and that tumors of differing metastatic potential differ in both the tumor- and the stroma-derived contributions. We have also demonstrated that a high proportion of the proteins differentially expressed between tumors of differing metastatic potential have causal effects on metastasis [2]. In this study, we applied this proteomic approach to characterize the ECM of patient-derived primary metastatic colorectal tumors, paired metastases to liver and normal colon and liver samples. We identified consistent differences in the ECMs of i) colon tumors as compared to normal colon, ii) colon cancer-derived metastases to the liver and normal liver, and iii) primary tumors as compared with metastases derived from them. Based on these changes, we demonstrate that robust signatures of ECM proteins characteristic of each tissue, normal and malignant, can be defined using relatively small samples (25mg) and from small numbers of patients [3]. The ECM proteins defined here represent candidate serological or tissue biomarkers, potential targets for imaging of occult metastases, and potential novel targets for therapies. Altogether, our results illustrate that the proteomic analysis of the composition of tumor ECMs offers promise for development of diagnostic and prognostic signatures of the metastatic potential of tumors. In addition, the fact that reliable results can be obtained using small tissue samples from limited numbers of patients opens the way to application of these methods to other tumor types. [1] Naba A, Clauser K.R, Hoersch S, Liu H, Carr S.A and Hynes RO. (2012) The matrisome: in silico definition and in vivo characterization by proteomics of normal and tumor extracellular matrices. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 11(4):M111.014647. [2] Naba A, Clauser K.R, Lamar J.M, Carr S.A and Hynes RO. (2014) Extracellular matrix signatures of human mammary carcinoma identify novel metastasis promoters. eLife, 3:e01308. [3] Naba A, Clauser K.R, Whittaker C.A, Carr S.A, Tanabe K.K and Hynes RO. (2014) Extracellular matrix signatures of human primary metastatic colon cancers and their metastases to liver. BMC Cancer, accepted. 7.3 Signaling Interactome Dynamics in Health and Disease Anne-Claude Gingras Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ONT, CA Kinases and phosphatases coordinate critical cellular decisions, including whether to grow and divide, to differentiate into a specific cell type, or to die. They must respond to environmental cues and transmit precise signals. Deregulation of the phosphorylation balance is implicated in multiple diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. This deregulation can involve mutations directly in the kinase or phosphatase proteins, changes in their splicing patterns, or may involve expression modulation; all these events can lead to network rewiring. Since kinases and phosphatases frequently associate with regulators, scaffolding molecules and substrates, a possible outcome of response to a cue, or a mutation or splicing alteration (besides modulation of intrinsic catalytic activity) is a change in these physical interactions. In the past several years, we have developed proteomics methods to monitor these regulated interactions for key signaling molecules. These include a coupling of affinity purification (AP) with Selected Reaction Monitoring or with the data independent acquisition approach SWATH. We recently introduced a normalization strategy to automatically calculate fold change and confidence in the regulated interactomes. With our collaborators, we have also been developing software tools to perform identification from SWATH data, leading in a more efficient utilization of the instrument time, while increasing sensitivity in the detection of the regulated interactions. We have harnessed the AP-SWATH approach to probe the dysregulation of kinases and phosphatase interactions induced by mutations, and to analyze the consequences of pharmacological treatment on the interactions established by signaling proteins. We will discuss these approaches in the context of cancer and vascular disease. 7.4 Structure of RNA Polymerase II – Mediator Holoenzyme Investigated through an Integrated Mass Spectrometry and Electron Microscopy Approach Michael J Trnka(1), Philip J. J. Robinson(2), Riccardo Pellarin(1), Andrej Sali(1), Roger D. Kornberg(2), A. L. Burlingame(1) (1)University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; (2)Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA Transcription of mRNA coding genes requires the assembly at the promoter of a large protein complex consisting of RNA polymerase II (pol II), the general transcription factors (GTFs), and the mediator of transcriptional regulation (Mediator). The Mediator complex plays a central role in transcriptional regulation by relaying gene specific regulatory signals to the general transcriptional machinery. The yeast holoenzyme between mediator and pol II consists of 33 subunits totaling over 1.5 MDa in size. The large size precludes atomic resolution crystallography of the entire assembly. Hence, hybrid methods of structure determination that integrate data from crystallography of stable subassemblies, cryoEM of the entire complex, and mass spectrometry (MS) are necessary to map protein complexes of this size. Mass spectrometry based structural techniques such as crosslinking and native-MS provide spatial restraints and stoichiometry information that guide the modeling process. Crosslinking-MS samples interacting surfaces by identifying amino acid residues that have been covalently modified through application of bifunctional reagents, while native MS permits the determination of stably associated assemblies of proteins in the gas-phase in a manner reflective of solution-state conformation and quaternary structure. The application of these structural MS tools to the holoenzyme system has necessitated the development of several technologies including: robust bioinformatics strategies for determining crosslinked peptides in large database searches, enrichment methods and chemical reagents for crosslinking, as we
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.748 | 0.676 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".