MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995173822

Hazing in sport

2016· article· en· W6995173822 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortugueseSubject (documents)Phase (matter)Action (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rites of passages have historically served to initiate individuals into a new phase of their lives, such as transitioning from childhood to adulthood. Some of these rites or initiation rituals were, and are, degrading, humiliating, and even brutal. These rites of passage have evolved in modern sport, and in the United States and Canada are termed hazing; however, similar phenomena exist across the world. Words used to describe hazing in other countries include bizutage in French, mopokaste in Finnish, novatada in Spanish, ragging in India, and praxe in Portuguese (Dias & Sá, 2014). The purpose of this chapter is to examine hazing practices in sport from both established and novel theoretical approaches, as well as to examine the prevention of hazing and suggest future areas to expand this research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)Same topicDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionFrench-language works237,207