MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995194914

« Spécial Canada »

2020· review· fr· W6995194914 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra) · 2020
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Subject (documents)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le numéro « Spécial Canada » de la revue de l’Association française des acteurs de l’éducation (AFAE) est à ne pas manquer. Riche d’une trentaine de contributions canadiennes, il permet de découvrir « une diversité de systèmes éducatifs performants », puisque cet État, dont Alain Bouvier rappelle dans son épilogue qu’il constitue une harmonieuse « communauté de communautés », ne compte pas moins de treize systèmes éducatifs. Le Canada à lui seul mérite un travail de comparatisme éducatif. Ce ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)Same topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207