MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995478179

One does not TAKE a sauna; one GOES to the sauna

2020· dissertation· en· W6995478179 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathingAction (physics)ImmigrationPower (physics)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Ethnography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bathing was once about an empathetic relationship \nwith nature; exposing oneself to the environment and \nletting nature becoming a part of oneself to cleanse \nand purify the body and mind. As a society, we live \nin a world where the acceleration of technology has \nconnected us with a digital world that is always at our \nfingertips; with speed and efficiency at the forefront. \nEven our bathing process has been accelerated. \nBathing was once a process of a public session \nlasting an entire morning or afternoon, and now \ndone by taking a ten minute shower in isolation, \ncompletely removed from nature. The journey \nwithin bathing is intended to be accompanied by \nfriends, family, neighbours and welcomed guests \nas a community exercise of social discourse and \ncollective purification. Public bathing was near \nextinction after World War II with the emergence \nof urban sprawl accompanied by the development \nof larger homes. In particular, the sauna shifted \nfrom an open communal experience, to a private \nand isolated action within the confinements of the \ndwelling. As a society, technology has us cognitively \nprocessing at rapid speeds and for long durations, influencing a pandemic of stress and mental health \nissues globally. People need more opportunities to \nstep away where time stands still and technology \nis muted, to detox and cleanse their mind of the \nstresses of the day. Bathing is about a journey of \nspiritually and physically immersing the body’s \nsensuality in a relationship with nature, to cleanse \nboth the body and the mind. The framework of \npublic bathing is more necessary than ever and \nwith the city of Sudbury already having a deeply \nrooted sauna culture from Finnish immigration in \nthe late nineteenth century, now is an appropriate \ntime to re-introduce a public sauna as an outlet \nto cleansing. An opportunity arises to connect \nto the lake culture that already exists in Sudbury, \nby experiencing the journey to a floating sauna \nlocated in the heart of Sudbury on Ramsey Lake. \nThis can further support the summer canoe culture \nand the winter ice fishing culture already identified, \nas a community nexus built on linking the journey \nwith nature, as a social hub, and most importantly \ncleansing the body and the mind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0210.014
Scholarly communication0.0150.012
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0050.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.063

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicGeographies of human-animal interactionsFrench-language works237,207