Osgoode Students Shine a Light on Freedom of Expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osgoode Students Shine a Light on Freedom of Expression\nTORONTO, March 1, 2013 –The International Legal Partnership (ILP) – a student-run international experiential education program based at York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School – is hosting three major events next week as part of its Advocacy Week activities. Members of the media are welcome to attend any or all of the following:\nPanel Discussion: Freedom of Expression in 2013: Issues and Currents\nMonday, March 4, 2013, 1 to 2.30 p. m.\nRoom 2002, Ignat Kaneff Building, Osgoode Hall Law School (see building 32 on map)\n(ILP is co-hosting this event with Osgoode’s Distinguished Speakers Series Organizing Committee)\nPanellists are Arnold Amber, President of the Canadian Journalists for Free Expression; Jamie Cameron, Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School; and Nathalie Des Rosiers, General Counsel for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.\nPanel Discussion: My Neighbours Became My Killers – Three Rwandan Tutsi genocide survivors of the 1994 massacre reflect on freedom of expression.\nThursday, March 7, 2013, 3.30 to 5.30 p.m.\nRoom 1014, Ignat Kaneff Building, Osgoode Hall Law School\n(ILP is co-hosting this event with Osgoode’s Black Law Students’ Association)\nFramed Experiences: An art exhibit and silent auction to benefit Osgoode students\nFriday, March 8, 2013, 4.30 to 6.30 p.m. (auction closes at 6 p.m.)\nCampbell House, 160 Queen Street West, Toronto\nKeynote address by Craig Scott, MP, Toronto-Danforth.\nEvery year the ILP arranges fellowships for Osgoode students in different countries around the world. Students work in partnership with host organizations, providing legal research and assistance in exchange for valuable, hands-on legal experience. The photos featured in this inaugural photo auction were all taken by Osgoode students while on their placements this past summer. All proceeds raised from this event will be directed towards funding the 2013 ILP fellowships. Visit http://www.internationallegalpartnership.org/ to view the photos that will be auctioned off.\n-30-\nMedia contact: Virginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.208 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".