Origini, diffusione e percezione del franglais in Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il plurilinguismo ha da sempre caratterizzato il Québec. In questo elaborato verrà trattato un particolare aspetto di questo plurilinguismo, cioè il fenomeno del franglais, varietà linguistica ibrida tra inglese e francese sempre più diffusa tra i giovani quebecchesi, trattando le sue origini, la sua diffusione e la sua generale percezione. A tal fine verrà illustrata la situazione linguistica del Canada, soffermandosi sulla situazione storica del Québec dalla prima colonizzazione alla Révolution Tranquille e sul sentimento di insécurité linguistique di cui soffrono i quebecchesi. Successivamente, verrà esaminato il franglais da un punto di vista linguistico, mettendolo poi in relazione ai fenomeni del joual e dello chiac e esaminando la sua diffusione. Infine, verrà analizzata la percezione del franglais tra i quebecchesi, le cui opinioni, sebbene generalmente negative, possono essere contrastanti.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".