O mítico e o onírico na estética de Afrânio Pessoa e Martha Telles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta dissertação visa o estudo da obra de Afrânio Pessoa (1930-2017), pintor do Piauí, na perspectiva histórica, estética, iconológica e simbólica, e na sua trajetória evolutiva, com ênfase nas vertentes mítica e onírica, comparadas com a obra de uma pintora sua contemporânea, Martha Telles (1930-2001). Seguimos, no caso de Afrânio Pessoa, as suas vivências, exposições, estudos, aprendizagens; as aulas ministradas nas Universidades Federal do Piauí, os estudos nas Escolas de Belas Artes do Rio de Janeiro e as vertentes criativas do seu percurso, tão marcado pelas características do viver nordestino. No caso de Martha Telles, os estudos na Escola de Belas Artes de Lisboa e Porto, do ensino nas Universidades de Montreal e de Moçambique. São trajetórias vividas pelos nossos dois pintores aqui contemplados, que permitem destacar aspectos coincidentes nos seus processos de fatura e no seu riquíssimo mundo criativo. É especialmente enfatizada a estrutura mítica e onírica comum a ambos os artistas, plena de carga aurática, que muito valoriza as suas obras.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".